Khine Khine Swe

Mitigating Human – Elephant Conflict in Shwe-U-Daung Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar

Destroyed by elephants, inspecting by governmental officials. taken by KKS.

Sugar cane plantation eaten by wild elephants at Dat-kite village. taken by KKS.

Cleaning activities in village & EPC, Dusit village, SUD, 17.1.10, (KKS-R).

Contribute equipment by field assistant, Sinhmway village, SUD, 16.1.10, (KKS-R).

Discussing authorities & officials @ meeting, Thabeikkyin, SUD, 11.12.09, (KKS-R).

For lighting in edge of cropland, Dirtkite village SUD, 16.1.10, (KKS-R).

Villager wrote the action plan, Thabeikkyin, SUD, 22.12.09, (KKS-R).

Town/RegionCountryCategoriesDate
Mandalay MyanmarAsia, Conflict, Mammals15 Nov 2007

Conflicts between wild elephants and local communities are increasing around Shwe-U-Daung Wildlife Sanctuary (SUD). In the past 5 years, elephants accidentally killed and injured the people in the surrounding communities, frightening people and intensifying conflicts. According to my socio-economic and attitude surveys conducted in 2002, I found that people’s attitudes are very negative towards the elephant in that it eats their crops but they value its conservation in the SUD area as well as conservation benefits the SUD provides. People indicated to me that they are looking for solutions that will help both them and the elephant survive together in the area.

I will accomplish this by facilitating a community- based process where communities share the various methods that they currently use to mitigate elephant damage, discuss new methods that have been successful in other countries, and take actions to mitigate elephant damage. For example, current methods employed by some villages include lights to scare elephants, special grain storage towers, and planting crops that do not attract elephants near houses. Methods that villages do not currently employ include permanent watchtowers in fields, fire on cattle-dung and chilli, and planting crops, such as sesame (good price in the market) that elephants do not like. Based on discussions of these methods with communities, I will help villages who wish to participate to write action plans employing methods they would like to try or that they feel are appropriate for them. By focusing on village resources and knowledge, supplemented with experiences from communities in other countries, we will build on the strengths and capacity that already exist in the village and contribute to helping them find community-based solutions, which will be more sustainable over the long-term.

I will also be working with colleagues at the Smithsonian Institution, including Drs. Teri Allendorf, Melissa Songer, and Peter Leimgruber, all of whom have been working in Myanmar on elephant-people issues since 1999. The warden and staff of SUD and of the local Forest Department are eager to support my project. Most importantly, I will be collaborating with the communities around SUD, with whom I have been working since 2002 on these issues, so they are familiar with me and eager to build their own capacity to improve their lives.

For more information contact tdksicas@yangon.net.mm

Project Update: January 2008

Progress Report on HEC near Shwe-U-Daung WS

During the first three months of the project, I have held meetings with officials of Forest Department, Shwe-U-Daung Wildlife Sanctuary, township authorities, etc., and local officials to introduce the project. Out of the eight villages with highest human-elephant conflict, we selected the five villages that have the most conflict with elephants. All the villages are active, motivated and willing to participate to test the methods. In each of the villages, we have created core group and made draft action plans. In the plans, they mentioned many methods. Those methods can be categorized as follows:

1) Smell – burning rubber, cattle dung & chili
2) Sound – using the loud speakers, bamboo detonate/explode
3) Temperature – fire lines using the litters
4) Visual cleaning nears the settlement/agricultural land – Thinning the edge of forest especially undestroyed species such as shrubs, herbs, tall grass, etc.
5) Crop selection – to plant the crop species that elephants do not eat
6) Signboards – posting the signboards at the crossing paths of wild elephants
7) Bee keeping – setting bee keeping boxes

The villages can conduct the majority of these activities with local resources and knowledge. However, beekeeping, for example, is not practiced in this area, so we have invited a staff person from the Livestock Department.

Project Update: June 2008

In those months, I monitored regularly the activities of villagers. There were 27 attempts by elephants to enter crop-fields at 5 study sites. Although people used the community methods such as sound, smell, fire-lines, the damages of 9 crop fields and 7 households were came out. Of many methods, using the loudspeakers was effective to drive the elephants away. One significance was found at one site that elephants did not enter the crop-land and human settlement where visual cleaning was done around its area, although elephants visited there closely at early night time during April 18th -29th.

In January, Ministry of Forestry had given the permission to a private catcher to capture 15 wild elephants using Kheddah Block method. Although 10 elephants were captured, 3 were dead during training period.

According to action plan, one-day training-workshop was conducted, and it was attended by 15 villagers (3 each from 5 sites) and 5 officials. Mapping, measuring, recording and keeping of every conflict incident were taught. All participants had contributed their conflict experiences, learnt from each other, and finally they were able to revise and modify their action plans for the cultivating season.

Project Update: September 2008

During 3rd quarter months, no attempt was made by elephants to enter croplands. All information were indicated that elephants were occurred inside the forest where food were abundance.

I had monitored regularly the activities of villagers, such as crop selection, planting, preparation to protect crops from raiding by elephants. According to the decisions of training-workshop, most of the villagers tried to plant crops such as sesame, peanuts, etc.; which are not favor by elephant. But I found that some people would like to plant sugarcane again in one village because the number of elephants was reduced since capture operation by Ministry of Forestry in February.

However, the leaders of communities tried to follow the action plan mentioning what they have to do. Therefore the preparation activities to protect crops from raiding by elephants were completely conducted during this period.

Final Reports

Read about the activities undertaken and findings of this project in the final report below.

File DownloadSize
Final Report.doc726 KB
Detailed Final Report.doc178.5 KB
2nd RSG Grant Awarded

Read about Khine's latest project http://www.ruffordsmallgrants.org/rsg/projects/khine_khine_swe_0


Other Projects in: